Jonas Schmidt

Economics and Econometrics · 2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jonas Schmidt trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. W. Viechtbauer
  2. M. Lajeunesse
  3. Kevin A. Hallgren
  4. Glenn W. Harrison
  5. H. Cooper
  6. Benjamin Scheibehenne
  7. Dan Ariely
  8. John A. List
  9. Min Ding
  10. L. Hedges

Papers from Jonas Schmidt's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jonas Schmidt trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
  2. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
  3. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
  4. The Construction of Preference: “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
  5. A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
  6. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (International Coaching Psychology Review)
  7. An Experimental Analysis of Ending Rules in Internet Auctions
  8. Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload
  9. An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism for Conjoint Analysis
  10. Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods

Their papers