Social cognitive model of adjustment to engineering majors: Longitudinal test across gender and race/ethnicity

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers (2017, background): “…et al., 2001, 2003), and predict engineering persistence intentions and career goals across numerous studies among engineering students (Inda et al., 2013; Lee, et al., 2015; Lent, Lopez, Lopez, & Sheu, 2008; Lent, Sheu, et al., 2008; Lent et al., 2003, 2014; Lent, Sheu, Gloster, & Wilkins, 2010).”
Social Cognitive Career Theory at 25: Progress in Studying the Domain Satisfaction and Career Self-Management Models (2019, result): “Lent, Ezeofor, Morrison, Penn, and Ireland (2016) found, consistent with hypotheses, that self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support were linked to goals for career exploration and that self-efficacy was strongly predictive of career decidedness and decisional anxiety (two potential out”
SCCT and Underrepresented Populations in STEM Fields (2017, background): “More recently, Lent et al. (2015) have followed up with the students they first assessed as freshmen to assess adjustment and choice stability over time, using the integrative model.”
Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self‐Efficacy: A Validation Study (2016, background): “Self-efficacy is related to engineering students’ intentions to persist in their major (Lent et al., 2015), but longer-term intentions may not have as much to do with self-efficacy.”