Relational Coaching: Journeys Towards Mastering One-To-One Learning

By E. D. Haan. 2008

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7c38958439450e489b9126c88c117781d26bd89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Adam M. Grant
2. J. Curd
3. Vicki Culpin
4. Yvonne D. Burger
5. Per-Olof Eriksson
6. E. D. Haan
7. Sharon K. Parker
8. Simone Kauffeld

Citations in the corpus

• Executive coaching in practice: what determines helpfulness for clients of coaching? (2011, methodology): “The Coaching Behaviours Questionnaire: The Coaching Behaviours Questionnaire was originally devised by Richard Philips (and published as Appendix E in De Haan & Burger, 2004) to measure the six categories of coaching intervention proposed by Heron (1975). In our book on executive coaching (De Haan &”
• A large-scale study of executive and workplace coaching: The relative contributions of relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. (2016, background): “From this perspective both coaching and psychotherapy belong to a general class of helping relationship (see de Haan, 2008, for discussion on similarities and differences between executive coaching and therapy).”
• EXECUTIVE COACHING OUTCOME RESEARCH: THE CONTRIBUTION OF COMMON FACTORS SUCH AS RELATIONSHIP, PERSONALITY MATCH, AND SELF-EFFICACY (2013, background): “There are various taxonomies of “common factors,” focusing on relationship-, client-, coach-, change-, and structure-related factors (e.g., de Haan, 2008; Grencavage & Norcross, 1990).”