Constituent structure is formulated in one stage.

By Martin J. Pickering, Holly P. Branigan, Janet McLean. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6c15d20933652ba9e6e62b5c7b2d2e2fe1266d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension (2005, background): “This alternative proposal is analogous to arguments made with respect to syntactic priming in production tasks, namely, that priming eVects are stronger for rarer or marked sentence types, such as for passives, double object datives, and locative fronting (Bock, 1986; Pickering et al., 2002).”
The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure (2003, background): “Obviously, the low proportion of Other responses meant that this measure was very similar to a measure based simply on the proportion of pre-nominal or relative-clause responses, but it was used for comparison with other research in which higher proportions of other responses occurred (e.g., Picker”
Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information (2006, methodology): “Some studies that claimed to investigate syntactic priming ignored this lexical boost effect and simply used the same verbs in the prime and target (e.g., Branigan et al., 1999; Pickering et al., 2002).”
of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production (2012, background): “Incorporating these and other variables such as the previous occurrence of a parallel structure (Weiner & Labov, 1983; Bock, 1986; Gries, 2005; Pickering et al., 2002; Szmrecsányi, 2005), a probability model of the dative alternation predicts the choice of construction for dative verbs in spoken Eng”
Structural priming: a critical review. (2008, background): “Though initial indications were consistent with the representation of dominance-only relations (Hartsuiker et al., 1999; Hartsuiker & Westenberg, 2000), other investigations specifically failed to find evidence for such a representation (Pickering et al., 2002).”
The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all (2003, background): “Finally, Pickering, Branigan, and McLean (2002) found that after shifted prepositional-dative primes (e.g., ‘‘The racing driver showed to the mechanic the dirty overalls’’), speakers were not more likely to produce prepositional dative targets (shifted or otherwise) than after double-object primes…”
Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English (2010, background): “From these and other variables such as the previous occurrence of a parallel structure (Bock 1986, Gries 2005b, Pickering et al. 2002, Szmrecsányi 2005), it is possible to predict the choice of dative construction in spoken English with 94% classification accuracy on unseen data (against a baseline…”
Processing verb argument structure across languages: Evidence for shared representations in the bilingual lexicon (2007, methodology): “This shows a balanced priming effect similar to the one obtained in L1 by Pickering et al. (2002).”
Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? (2004, background): “In contrast, some studies have demonstrated symmetric priming (Bock, 1986; Bock & Griffin, 2000; Pickering, Branigan, & McLean, 2002 ).”
Linguistic alignment between people and computers (2010, result): “This would be consistent with evidence that highly dispreferred syntactic structures may not be primed (Pickering et al., 2002).”
Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of give in New Zealand and American English (2008, background): “Quantitative differences in the effect of animacy on the choice of syntactic paraphrases have also been observed in another area of English grammar, the genitive alternation (see Hundt (1998) on NZ English, and Rosenbach (2002, 2003), and Hinrichs and Szmrecsányi (2006) on American and British Engli”