Elementary Students' Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments over the School Year.
By Katherine L. McNeill. 2011
257 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6b3b5aa52198f0a225a506fca9457f34fca15a1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Amelia Wenk Gotwals
- Nancy Butler Songer
- Christian D. Schunn
- Meghan E. Bathgate
- Amanda Crowell
- Tanya S. Wright
- Yong Wu
- Kwangsu Cho
In Education
- Amelia Wenk Gotwals
- Nancy Butler Songer
- Christian D. Schunn
- Meghan E. Bathgate
- Amanda Crowell
- Yong Wu
- Tanya S. Wright
- Kwangsu Cho
Citations in the corpus
- The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation (2015, background): “These details of these components of argumentative sensemaking are what distinguish argumentation in science from argumentation in other domains (Berland & McNeill, 2010; McNeill, 2011).”
- Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. (2012, result): “Research by McNeill (2011) suggests another possible explanation for our fourth graders’ weakness in generating two pieces of evidence that supports their claim: that fourth graders do not recognize evidence as data.”