Two Traditions of Research on Gender Identity

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Defending the Sex/Gender Binary: The Role of Gender Identification and Need for Closure (2020, background): “…makeup of an individual (e.g., chromosomes, anatomy), while “gender” can refer to associated roles (i.e., what it means to be a woman or a man in a specific culture) or self-identity (i.e., self-categorization into “women” and “men”; American Psychological Association, 2018; Wood & Eagly, 2015).”
Applying the Master Narrative Framework to Gender Identity Development in Emerging Adulthood (2017, background): “Traditionally, gender identity has been defined as the ways in which people understand themselves as male or female in the cultural contexts in which they are developing (e.g., Wood & Eagly, 2015).”