Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention

By G. Moskowitz. 2002

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f294dff60dd5b9bf4ccc9be9d2e69407ca8aa534

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The dynamics of consumer behavior: A goal systemic perspective (2012, unknown): “various studies (Aarts et al., 2001; Balcetis & Dunning, 2006; Ferguson & Bargh, 2004; Förster, Liberman, & Higgins, 2005; Moskowitz, 2002).”
What catches the envious eye? Attentional biases within malicious and benign envy (2014, background): “…highly flexible, such that the allocation of attention is influenced by temporary motivations, like activated romantic goals (Koranyi & Rothermund, 2012; Maner, Gailliot, Rouby, & Miller, 2007) or temporary goals set by current tasks (Moskowitz, 2002; Vogt, De Houwer, Crombez, & Van Damme, 2013).”
Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, the present research contributes to the literature on goal completion (Martin & Tesser, 1996; Moskowitz, 2002; Rothermund, 2003) and goal/task disengagement (e.”
Two Is Not Always Better Than One (2009, unknown): “automatic processes (System 1) and controlled processes (System 2) conflicts with recent findings about the role of goals and intentions on various automatic processes (e.g., Eitam, Hassin, & Schul, 2008; Moskowitz, 2002) and/or with the influence on controlled processes on the experience of emotion”
The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective (2020, background): “The process is understood as a form of compensatory response to activated, but yet unattained goals (Moskowitz, 2002).”
Health and goal-directed behavior: The nonconscious regulation and motivation of goals and their pursuit (2007, background): “First, studies that looked into the role of discrepancy (Fein & Spencer, 1997; Koole, Smeets, van Knippenberg, & Dijksterhuis, 1999; Moskowitz, 2002) manipulated it explicitly, hence leading to awareness of the goal itself.”
I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli (2012, background): “Kitayama, S. (1996).”
The Theory Behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect (2012, background): “…studies by Neisser and colleagues on inattentional blindness (e.g., Neisser, 1979) to more recent studies on the subconscious priming of explicit goals (e.g., Chartrand and Bargh, 1996; Moskowitz, 2002), the literature has revealed powerful top-down effects of goals on information processing.”
Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity (2017, unknown): “Preferential attention to temporarily relevant stimuli, such as those associated with a current task or decision, is supported by WM; when a goal is active in WM, stimuli relevant to that goal are more likely to attract attention (e.g., Moskowitz 2002; Soto et al. 2005; Vogt et al. 2010).”
Modern prejudice: Subtle, but unconscious? The role of Bias Awareness in Whites' perceptions of personal and others' biases (2015, background): “(2011) on the dynamics of egalitarian goals has shown that people with egalitarian goals (such as Whites high in Bias Awareness) are strongly motivated to pursue their egalitarian goal through a compensatory act when their egalitarian goal is unfulfilled (e.g., challenged by high bias feedback; Mosk”
Motivation and the Goal Theory of Current Concerns (2011, methodology): “One (Moskowitz, 2002) experimentally activated common goals (and replicated the effect using a non-Stroop method), and at least one presented food-related and neutral stimuli to obese or dieting individuals versus normalweight or underweight people (Fadardi, Moghadaszadeh, & Rezazadeh, 2009).”
The goal construct in social psychology. (2007, background): “Recent evidence provides more methodologically rigorous support for the theoretical claim of the New Look that an active goal increases the accessibility of related knowledge (Aarts et al., 2002; Balcetis & Dunning, 2006; Forster et al., 2005; Moskowitz, 2002).”
Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control☆ (2011, methodology): “And once a tension state is addressed, goal operations are eliminated or halted (e.g., Bargh et al., 2001; Koole et al., 1999; Liberman & Förster, 2000; Moskowitz, 2002; Spencer et al., 1998).”