The Theory Behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect

By Andrew E. Reed, L. Carstensen. Front. Psychology, 2012

695 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The “positivity effect” refers to an age-related trend that favors positive over negative stimuli in cognitive processing. Relative to their younger counterparts, older people attend to and remember more positive than negative information. Since the effect was initially identified and the conceptual basis articulated (Mather and Carstensen, 2005) scores of independent replications and related findings have appeared in the literature. Over the same period, a number of investigations have failed to observe age differences in the cognitive processing of emotional material. When findings are considered in theoretical context, a reliable pattern of evidence emerges that helps to refine conceptual tenets. In this article we articulate the operational definition and theoretical foundations of the positivity effect and review the empirical evidence based on studies of visual attention, memory, decision making, and neural activation. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions with emphasis on the conditions where a focus on positive information may benefit and/or impair cognitive performance in older people.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f9d9f00f378cb5eb42e9b26062b2a14290f5508d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. L. Chan
  2. Joseph A. Mikels
  3. S. Scheibe
  4. Andrew E. Reed
  5. H. Zacher
  6. Mara Mather

In General Decision Sciences

  1. L. Chan
  2. Joseph A. Mikels
  3. S. Scheibe
  4. Andrew E. Reed
  5. H. Zacher

In Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

  1. S. Scheibe
  2. H. Zacher
  3. L. Chan
  4. Joseph A. Mikels
  5. C. Mackie
  6. Andrew E. Reed
  7. Arthur A. Stone
  8. Division on Behavioral

Citations in the corpus