Two Is Not Always Better Than One

By G. Keren, Y. Schul. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009

607 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe344cf098ad601f5856e45f795b54c314cbc748

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Cognitive Bias Modification and Cognitive Control Training in Addiction and Related Psychopathology (2013, background): “In a critical review (Keren & Schul, 2009), it was argued that much of the evidence used to support the existence of such dissociable systems is problematic.”
Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government (2013, background): “Those that have focused on automatic processes have often not recognised important distinctions within these processes (Keren & Schul, 2009).”
Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning (2012, background): “The tendency to refer to dual-process theory (singular) is a gift to critics (eg, Keren & Schul, 2009 ; Kruglanski & Gigerenzer, 2011 ) who like to point to weaknesses or ambiguities in some accounts as a reason to discredit the whole movement.”
The Power of Goal-Directed Processes in the Causation of Emotional and Other Actions (2017, background): “Most standard dual-process models, however, go further in that they map this content-based dichotomy onto other dichotomies (Keren & Schul, 2009; Moors, 2014a).”
Reflections on reflection: the nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning (2019, unknown): “While popular, dual-process theories in cognitive and social psychology are also controversial, having been subject to a number of critical papers by leading authors (Gigerenzer, 2011; Keren & Schul, 2009; Kruglanski & Gigerenzer, 2011; Melnikoff & Bargh, 2018; Osman, 2004).”
Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach (2010, background): “1250; see also Evans, 2007 ; Gigerenzer & Regier, 1996 ; Keren & Schul, 2009 ; Osman, 2004 ).”
A Typology of Players: Between Instinctive and Contemplative (2016, unknown): “…with Kahneman (2011) who classified quick and instinctive responses as being the product of a system I decision process and slower contemplative responses as being the product of a system II decision process (for a critique of the two systems approach, see for example Keren and Schul (2009)).”
A User's Guide to Debiasing (2014, background): “…complete theory would likely model the human mind as comprised of multiple interrelated processes, many scholars have found it useful to conceive of decision making as guided by two mental systems – System 1 and System 2 (Kahneman, 2011; for a critique of this distinction, see Keren & Schul, 2009).”
The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “…process accounts, including that the range of features ascribed to each type of thinking process are imperfectly aligned to each other and the overarching processes (Keren & Schul, 2009) and that an alternative rule-based, unisystem model can explain human judgement (Kruglanski & Gigerenzer, 2011).”
The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models (2011, background): “And in parallel, they also have received a sizable share of criticism (Keren & Schul, 2009; Kruglanski & Gigerenzer, 2011; Osman, 2004).”