Nature of Science and Decision-Making

By R. Khishfe. 2012

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1bfa1710a4026c4336117424680f5e7b0deaf01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Claudia Vergara
2. José M. Pavez
3. Martina Valencia
4. P. Nunez
5. David Santibáñez
6. H. Cofré
7. R. Khishfe
8. Troy D. Sadler

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Claudia Vergara
2. José M. Pavez
3. Martina Valencia
4. P. Nunez
5. David Santibáñez
6. H. Cofré

In Social Psychology

1. Claudia Vergara
2. José M. Pavez
3. Martina Valencia
4. P. Nunez
5. David Santibáñez
6. H. Cofré
7. R. Khishfe

Citations in the corpus

• A Critical Review of Students’ and Teachers’ Understandings of Nature of Science (2019, methodology): “There has been a substantial amount of research on NOS in recent years, which is reflected in the numerous reviews and analyses of the current status of the topic (e.g., Lederman 2007; Hodson 2009; Deng et al. 2011; Abd-El-Khalick 2012; Khishfe 2012; Lederman and Lederman 2014) as well as practical ”
• Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An effect on student learning and transfer (2014, methodology): “Recently, Khishfe (2012c) explored whether high school students are able to transfer their acquired NOS understandings learned in the context of genetic engineering and apply them into two similar contexts.”