Best Practices in Increasing Academic Learning Time
By M. Gettinger, Jill K. Seibert. 2001
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1542ae1332cdde752d03218a46690ff0ca639b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jim Ysseldyke
- Renee O. Hawkins
- Jared R. Morris
- Hillary Denune
- William J. Therrien
- Lauren Kimener
- S. K. Benson
- Dacia M. McCoy
Citations in the corpus
- A Comparison of iPads and Worksheets on Math Skills of High School Students with Emotional Disturbance (2012, methodology): “In terms of the variable of engagement, Andy’s average percentage of engagement for the worksheet condition was well below the minimal 80% level suggested by research (Gettinger & Seibert, 2002).”
- Effects of a Learning Information System on Mathematics Achievement and Classroom Structure (2003, background): “levels of academic learning time and achievement (Gettinger, 1995).”
- A Review and Analysis of Constructivism for School-Based Practice (2002, background): “School psychologists can be helpful by suggesting ways to enhance student effort based on their knowledge of evidence-based effective instructional strategies such as increasing student engaged time (Gettinger, 1995) and selecting tasks in which many students can experience success (Gettinger & Stoi”
- Explicit Instruction: Historical and Contemporary Contexts (2017, background): “…explicit instruction and direct instruction components (e.g., clear presentations, dynamic models, frequent responding, guided practice with feedback) address basic prerequisites of learning such as academic learning time (Gettinger & Seibert, 2002) and opportunity to respond (Heward & Wood, 2013).”