Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection.

By Eric Rietzschel, B. Nijstad, Wolfgang Stroebe. 2006

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f125fa6ec406c8d780d6554479ebbe6c782ea029

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence (2010, methodology): “Additionally, we have developed coding schemes to reliably score ideas on originality and feasibility on 5-point scales (from 1¼ ‘‘not original/feasible’’ to 5¼ ‘‘highly original/feasible’’; e.g., De Dreu et al., 2008; Rietzschel et al., 2006).”
Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity (2014, background): “In contrast, the dialectical model shifts the emphasis to processes involved in evaluating novel ideas, which have received much less research attention (Harvey & Kou, 2013; Rietzschel et al., 2006).”
Effects of Problem Scope and Creativity Instructions on Idea Generation and Selection (2014, background): “Rietzschel et al.’s (2010) results suggest that the idea selection will benefit from creativity instructions, because these diminish participants’ reliance on feasibility as the dominant selection criterion.”
Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness (2015, background): “For example, shifting from learning to performance can be more conducive to creativity when the idea generation and selection phases are structurally separated (Rietzschel et al., 2006) or when task performance is highly complex and requires prerequisite learning (Cianci et al.”
Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question (2010, methodology): “Based on the ideas about creativity developed by Rietzschel et al. (2007), we would suggest a somewhat different interpretation.”
A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity (2013, background): “Traditionally, creativity research conceptualizes convergence as the decision making task of selecting between generated ideas (e.g., Amabile, 1988; Rietzschel et al., 2006).”