A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A scattered CAT: A critical evaluation of the consensual assessment technique for creativity research. (2019, methodology): “Harvey (2013) used a nine-point scale with three judges to measure the total creativity of a poster task for the 2012 Olympic games.”
A Dynamic Perspective on Diverse Teams: Moving from the Dual-Process Model to a Dynamic Coordination-based Model of Diverse Team Performance (2016, background): “The studies on the informational benefits of deep-level diversity have not always detected the information coordination issues faced by diverse groups since often they focus on tasks in which no coordination between group members is required (Harvey, 2013).”
Different Strokes for Different Teams: The Contingent Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on the Creativity of Informationally Homogeneous and Diverse Teams (2017, background): “…benefits of generative processing in the sense of members not only making unique contributions but also linking them by building on each other’s ideas (Harvey, 2013; 2014) and prompting teammates to consider new contexts (Brown et al., 1998) or frames of reference (Hargadon & Bechky, 2006).”