Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies

By René Belderbos, Martin A. Carree, B. Diederen, Boris Lokshin, Reinhilde Veugelers. 2004

918 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee05de245874faad5d5fd128bc90ffe81bed7387

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners (2010, methodology): “Belderbos et al. (2004a) found using two consecutive CIS surveys (1996 and 1998)”
When and with whom to cooperate? Investigating effects of cooperation stage and type on innovation capabilities and success (2017, methodology): “Only Belderbos et al. (2004) used a more holistic approach and included all mentioned R&D cooperation types to determine their effect on innovations success.”
Cooperative R&D and firm performance (2004, background): “Distinguishing m pecifically between partnerships with competit uppliers, customers, and universities and rese nstitutes, Belderbos et al. (2004)find substantia eterogeneity in the determinants to establish R ollaborations with different partners.”
Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation—Happy Together? (2008, positive): “Our study differs from Belderbos et al. (2004b) and Cincera et al. (2003) by including a direct measure of the success firms achieve thanks to process innovations, i.e. cost reductions due to process innovations.”
Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies (2005, positive): “, 2003; Belderbos et al., 2004a). Few theoretical studies have examined the interaction between different innovation or cooperation strategies.3 Athey and Schmutzler (1995) consider the simultaneous implementation of two innovation strategies by a single firm. They find complementarity between produ”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, positive): “These studies investigate the extent to which different alliance types lead to improvement in ﬁ rm's performance outcomes (e.g., Belderbos, Carree, & Lokshin, 2004; Köhler, Sofka, & Grimpe, 2012; Laursen & Salter, 2006; Salge, Farchi, Barrett, & Dopson, 2013).”
Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs (2009, positive): “Studies based on innovation survey data most often use the share of sales generated by new products as a success indicator (see Crépon et al., 1998; Belderbos et al., 2004; Lööf and Heshmati, 2002; Janz et al., 2004; Griffith et al., 2006; Parisi et al., 2005; Roper et al., 2007), sometimes distingu”
Patterns of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services (2009, methodology): “If a significant correlation exists, the use of separate probit models leads to inefficient estimates (Belderbos, Carree, Diederen, & Lokshin, 2004 ).”
Micro-level analysis of farmers' adaptation to climate change in Southern Africa (2007, methodology): “…normal distribution requires multidimensional integration, and a number of simulation methods have been put forward to approximate such a function with the Geweke-Hajivassiliou-Keane (GHK) simulator (Geweke et al. 1997; Hajvassilion et al., 1996) being widely used, (Belderbos et al. 2004 ).”
The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms (2011, background): “Consequently, close collaboration with universities facilitates new breakthrough innovations and products (Belderbos et al., 2004).”
Did the global financial crisis impact firms' innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries (2018, neutral): “Cooperation with suppliers is found to enhance efficiency and complement the technological-base of the firm (Belderbos et al., 2004; Un et al., 2010).”