The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms
By Jin Chen, Yu-fen Chen, Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke. 2011
422 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/087058eccffbf81a763fe514b746a461aa745d9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Joaquín Alegre
- Mercedes Sánchez-Apellaniz García
- Anabel Fernández-Mesa
- José Luis Ferreras-Méndez
- María Luisa Flor
- Marian Garcia Martinez
- S. Newell
- Ferdaous Zouaghi
Citations in the corpus
- Open innovation: a new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs (2015, background): “For example, Chen et al. (2011) found that the breadth and depth of openness can improve both science-based and experience-based innovation, and Chiang and Hung (2010) found that breadth affects incremental innovation, whilst depth influences radical innovation.”
- The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU (2021, background): “imply a less intensive adoption of scientific and technological interactions and, therefore, a lower influence by universities and scientific labs on the innovation performance of SMEs than in core areas (Chen et al., 2011; Malaver, 2013).”
- The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look (2016, background): “For instance, developing deep and broad relationships with external agents may generate noteworthy benefits for firms (Laursen and Salter, 2006; Chen et al., 2011; Cruz-González et al., 2015).”
- Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries (2017, background): “Collaboration with competitors enables firms speedy market penetration (Van Beers and Zand, 2014) and access to technological abilities that can be difficult, time-consuming, and costly to develop alone within their boundaries (Chen et al., 2011).”
- Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance (2012, background): “…of accumulating technological capabilities involves building various kinds of linkages within which firms can interact in leveraging unique technological resources combinations (Chen et al., 2011; Grimpe and Kaiser, 2010; Freel and De Jing, 2009; Lin et al., 2009; Rothaermel and Alexandre, 2009).”
- Did the global financial crisis impact firms' innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries (2018, positive): “Collaboration with competitors enables firms speedy market penetration (van Beers and Zand 2014) and access to technological abilities that can be difficult, time-consuming, and costly to develop alone within their boundaries (Chen et al., 2011).”
- External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms (2017, background): “…measured by the percentage of R&D personnel as a share of all employees; and dummies representative of the sectors examined, since previous research suggests these variables can exert an influence on a firm’s radical innovation (e.g. Chen et al., 2011; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2012; Zhou & Li, 2012).”
- Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity (2015, background): “…exploitation processes (Zahra & George, 2002) and the danger of knowledge leakage tends to be greater when STI industries sustain a wide number of external collaboration (Chen et al., 2011) may explain why the breadth of openness was not relevant to improving firm innovation in the present study.”