Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control.

By Andrea Bari, Trevor W. Robbins. Progress in neurobiology, 2013

1,794 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb93e75fdd8ea4af47835580a5d975e887529291

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Psychiatry and Mental health

Citations in the corpus

Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective (2016, background): “Prior studies have shown that preoccupation with a behavior triggers strong urges to engage in the behavior [22, 39, 67], which then lead to problematic behaviors [5].”
The Classroom as a Developmental Context for Cognitive Development: A Meta-Analysis on the Importance of Teacher–Student Interactions for Children’s Executive Functions (2018, background): “Inhibition is the ability to suppress an automatic response, thought, or emotion in favor of a less dominant, though often more appropriate, response (Bari & Robbins, 2013).”
Quantifying Inhibitory Control as Externalizing Proneness: A Cross-Domain Model (2018, positive): “As noted at the outset, inhibitory control is a complex construct, encompassing multiple psychological facets (e.g., Berg et al., 2015; Carver et al., 2011; Fischer et al., 2008; Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) and differing neural circuits/ processes (e.g., Bari & Robbins, 2013; Schall et al., 2017).”
The cognitive neuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A critical review (2015, neutral): “Behavioral impulsivity is a complex non-unitary construct, particularly when considering neuropsychological and neurobiological correlates (Bari & Robbins, 2013); and inhibition is considered to be an aspect of impulsivity according to contemporary theoretical models (Bari & Robbins, 2013).”
The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences (2017, result): “…example of this issue, as it is often assumed that a common response control trait underlies performance on these tasks (for a review, see Bari & Robbins, 2013), though this assumption has received mixed support from correlational research (Aichert et al., 2012; Cyders & Coskunpinar,…”
Attentional Mechanisms of Distractor Suppression (2014, background): “There is a long history of research linking inhibitory control in different cognitive domains with prefrontal-lobe function (Bari & Robbins, 2013).”
Cognitive interference elicits developmental sex differences in inhibitory control (2025, unknown): “Importantly, extensive literature indicates that inhibitory control is not a unitary construct and is not synonymous with global inhibitory function (Bari and Robbins, 2013; Friedman and Miyake, 2004; Howard et al., 2014; Nigg, 2000; Tiego et al., 2018).”