The personal norm of reciprocity

By Marco Perugini, Marcello Gallucci, F. Presaghi, A. Ercolani. 2003

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb784dfa66a6bfe602e3fd15b45bc8dbc3107dc6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Understanding Relationship Marketing and Loyalty Program Effectiveness in Global Markets (2015, unknown): “This “norm of reci-procity” (Palmatier et al. 2009; Perugini et al. 2003) may lead to a trade-off situation in which the costs of reciprocation outweigh the benefits of continuing the relationship.”
On the Economics and Biology of Trust (2009, background): “The German SOEP provides such a measure based on two questions taken from the Reciprocity questionnaire (Perugini et al. 2003): (i) “If I suffer a serious wrong, I will take 6.”
The Dark Triad and Nascent Entrepreneurship: An Examination of Unproductive versus Productive Entrepreneurial Motives (2016, methodology): “Specifically, the measures used for comparison included the negative and positive reciprocity scales developed by Perugini et al. (2003) to examine personal norms of reciprocity, as well as the profit-seeking and fairness scales developed by Leybman, Zuroff, and Fournier (2011) to examine social…”
The Preference Survey Module: A Validated Instrument for Measuring Risk, Time, and Social Preferences (2016, methodology): “Many survey items were taken or adapted from existing surveys, like the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) or the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY), or from previous research (e.g., Weber et al. 2002, Perugini et al. 2003).”
Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes (2008, methodology): “These questions are based on the measure developed by Perugini et al. (2003) and were included in the SOEP for the first”
Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility as predictors of revenge intentions (2012, methodology): “Seventy-six percent of the 1 The Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness scales used in Perugini et al. (2003) were preliminary versions of the scales that were subsequently included in the HEXACO Personality Inventory (Lee & Ashton, 2004).”
Linking workplace incivility to citizenship performance: The combined effects of affective commitment and conscientiousness (2012, background): “Moreover, negative reciprocity has been shown to be associated with conscientiousness (Perugini et al., 2003).”