Gender and Emotion in the United States: Do Men and Women Differ in Self‐Reports of Feelings and Expressive Behavior?1

By R. Simon, Leda E. Nath. American Journal of Sociology, 2004

629 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9d4965c50d8911fdbf628dfa44c3cdf26ab3394

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sex, Anger and Depression (2010, background): “Moreover, while there are some differences in the ways in which men and women manage anger (e.g., women tend to talk with others while men tend to use substances), there is no evidence that women are more likely than men to suppress these feelings (Lively and Powell 2006; Simon and Nath 2004).”
Observing Incivility toward Coworkers and Negative Emotions: Do Gender of the Target and Observer Matter? (2012, background): “samples suggests that women experience more negative emotion than men (Brody 1993; Brody and Hall 1993; Simon and Nath 2004).”
Gender and emotion in context. (2008, background): “However, when asked about the intensity of their anger, sometimes women report getting more intensely angry than men (e.g., Simon & Nath, 2004) and sometimes they show no gender differences, as was shown across 37 different countries (Fischer et al., 2004).”
Crossing the line(s): A dual threshold model of anger in organizations (2007, background): “Studies confirm the predominance of this strategy, reporting that most individuals prefer to recount their anger-provoking incident publicly (Fitness 2000; Rimé, 1995b; Simon & Nath, 2004), especially in the company of those who sympathize with their cause and feelings (Tice & Baumeister, 1993).”
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes (2015, background): “These constraints can also apply to groups of people whose shared demographic characteristics (e.g. gender) expose them to societal norms concerning the expected quality of emotion experiences (Simon & Nath, 2004).”
Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? (2006, background): “Women are more likely discuss their anger with uninvolved people (Simon & Nath, 2004) and to cry (Averill, 1982; Campbell, 1993; Eagly & Steffen, 1986; Hoover-Dempsey, Plas & Wallston, 1986; Timmers et al. 1998; Zemen & Garber, 1996).”
Confounded Coefficients: Extending Recent Advances in the Accurate Comparison of Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups (2004, neutral): “Simon and Nath (2004) model the expression of negative or positive emotion as a function of covariates including having children and household income.”
Anger in Organizations: Review and Integration (2010, background): “A recent large sample survey of U.S. adults confirms this finding (Simon & Nath, 2004).”
Towards a Theory of Collective Emotions (2013, background): “The shaping of emotions has been shown for different institutional settings (Turner, 2007), stratified groups (Collett & Lizardo, 2010), gender (Simon & Nath, 2004), race (Harvey Wingfield, 2010), identity (Stets, 2005), and culture (Heise, 2010).”
Negative emotions of an entrepreneurial career: Self-employment and regulatory coping behaviors (2011, methodology): “Third, we controlled for Education (calculated as years of education based on highest year of school completed) because education influences the use of coping tools and thus the experience of negative emotions (Simon and Nath, 2004).”
The pains and pleasures of parenting: when, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well-being? (2014, background): “Indeed, several studies have shown that, compared to nonparents, parents report feeling more anger (Ross & Van Willingen, 1996; Simon & Nath, 2004), and caring for children was ranked as one of the most negative-affect-eliciting activities (second to working; Kahneman et al., 2004).”