Why labour market experiments

By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr. 2003

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e86c378d6093aa51198c3d982ec4964beed3b647

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Peter Kuhn
2. Gary Charness
3. Roman M. Sheremeta
4. Timothy N. Cason
5. William A. Masters
6. Peter A. Bamberger
7. Elena Belogolovsky
8. I. Barankay

In General Decision Sciences

1. Roman M. Sheremeta
2. Peter Kuhn
3. Gary Charness
4. Timothy N. Cason
5. Peter A. Bamberger
6. Elena Belogolovsky
7. Sebastian Kube
8. Subhasish M. Chowdhury

In Safety Research

1. Roman M. Sheremeta
2. Peter Kuhn
3. Timothy N. Cason
4. William A. Masters
5. Gary Charness
6. Nicola Radmore
7. Peter A. Bamberger
8. J. Benenson

Citations in the corpus

• Children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game (2007, background): “Furthermore, field evidence of naturally occurring altruistic behavior both provides ecological validity for and permits modification of the parameters of the games so that they more closely mimic elements of natural interactions (Falk & Fehr, 2003).”
• Signaling in Secret: Pay-for-Performance and the Incentive and Sorting Effects of Pay Secrecy (2014, background): “As noted by others (Falk & Fehr, 2003; Falk & Heckman, 2009), lab experiments offer several significant advantages over naturally occurring field data, such as allowing us to systematically vary our exogenous variables (e.g., transparency of pay communications) while keeping everything else fixed,…”
• Macroeconomics: A Survey of Laboratory Research (2016, unknown): “, Falk and Gächter ( 2008 ) and Falk and Fehr ( 2003 ) ) .”
• Lab Labor: What can Labor Economists Learn from the Lab? (2010, background): “Furthermore, in another treatment the (11,2) split is implemented if the dictator loses to the recipient, while otherwise the (8,8) split is implemented.”
• A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition (2012, unknown): “Increasingly, laboratory experiments have featured real effort tasks.4 Real effort generates greater external validity, but makes precise quantification difficult (Falk and Fehr, 2003).”
• Entry into Winner-Take-All and Proportional-Prize Contests: An Experimental Study (2010, background): “3 A review of this literature is provided in Falk and Fehr (2003) and Irlenbusch (2006). take-all tournaments that might lead contest sponsors to seek different designs (Lazear, 1999; 2000).”
• Expenditures and Information Disclosure in Two-Stage Political Contests (2010, background): “3 A review of this literature is provided in Falk and Fehr (2003) and Irlenbusch (2006).”