The Role of Livestock Production Ethics in Consumer Values Towards Meat

By M. McEachern, M. Schröder. 2002

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay (2010, background): “Although tangible aspects can markedly affect most purchasing decisions, independently from the knowledge and awareness of the consumer, intangible attributes are important for high-involvement consumers possessing enough beliefs and attitudes (McEachern and Schröder, 2002).”
Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution (2016, background): “Main food shopper status is associated with higher involvement (Drichoutis et al., 2005), a better knowledge of the market (Reed et al., 2003) and a higher control over the resources and the nature of the food products that enter a household (Schmeer, 2005; McEachern and Schröder, 2002).”
Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey (2010, unknown): “Previous studies show that consumers seem more concerned about the welfare of poultry than of other farm animals (Verbeke and Viaene 2000; McEachern and Schro¨der 2002; European Commission 2005), despite consumption of conventionally reared white meat exceeding that of red meat.”
Producers and consumers of organic meat: A focus on attitudes and motivations (2004, background): “As the residential location of the consumer is an important factor in shaping cognitive and affective responses to meat purchase behaviour ( McEachern and Schroder, 2002”