Corporate Governance and Democracy: The Stakeholder Debate Revisited

By C. Driver, Grahame F. Thompson. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e4c460aeb4387afcd3cd51212597e31f9d531794

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices (2015, background): “These do not represent two absolute positions, with real company accountability practices falling somewhere along a continuum between areas of minimum and maximum responsibility (Eells, 1960). Quazi and O’Brien (2000) take a two-dimensional view by adding an axis representing the benefits and costs ”
Stakeholder Rights and Corporate Governance: A Cross-National Study of Hostile Takeovers (2004, background): “While the German and Japanese systems are often placed in the same category for their similar emphasis on stakeholders, internal constraints, and relation-based corporate governance, their differences are equally evident (see Charkham, 1994; Prowse, 1995; Driver and Thompson, 2002).”
Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (2007, background): “Stakeholder theory is closely related to the issue of corporate social responsibility to the extent that stakeholder theorists define appropriate and inappropriate corporate behavior in terms of how corporations act vis-a ` -vis their stakeholders (Driver & Thompson, 2002: 117).”
Top Executive Remuneration: A View from Europe (2005, background): “With the stakeholder approach, senior managers suspend their own immediate self-interest, and make important enterprise decisions according to the interests of the firm’s stakeholders as a whole, or for the firm as a ‘community’ ( Driver and Thompson, 2002 ).”
The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World – A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy (2011, unknown): “There are some proposals on the democratic reform of corporate governance that may be helpful and need to be developed further (see Driver and Thompson 2002; Gomez and Korine 2008; Parker 2002; Thompson 2008).”
Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm (2005, background): “However, the implications of property rights theory for stakeholder analysis are still at a nascent stage of development (Aguilera and Cuervo-Cazurra, 2004; Aguilera and Jackson, 2003; Donaldson and Preston, 1995; Grandori, 2004; Thompson and Driver, 2002; Zingales, 2000).”