Top Executive Remuneration: A View from Europe

By A. Bruce, T. Buck, Brian G. M. Main. 2005

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/181127474778b7820b0cae22e867008bd2b3235a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. Pursey PMAR Heugens
4. Mike W. Peng
5. J. Otten
6. Sabrina F. Saleh
7. Canan C. Mutlu
8. H. Oosterhout

In Finance

1. P. Duran
2. H. Oosterhout
3. Mike W. Peng
4. Pursey PMAR Heugens
5. Marc van Essen

In Management Information Systems

1. J. Otten
2. Mike W. Peng
3. Pursey PMAR Heugens
4. Marc van Essen

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “Second, the key assumptions of standard corporate governance mechanisms regarding self-interested agents and goal conflicts may not hold in contexts characterized by relationship-based governance regimes (Bruce et al., 2005; Chua et al., 2009; Gomez-Mejia et al., 2005; Luen et al., 2013).”
• An institution-based view of executive compensation: A multilevel meta-analytic test (2012, background): “Recent work in international business (Bruce et al., 2005; Peng & Khoury, 2008; Sun et al., 2010) has suggested partitioning country-level institutional influences into those deriving from formal institutions – those intentionally created and enforced by the state (Goodin, 1996; North, 1990) – and…”