On the Unnecessary Ubiquity of Hierarchical Linear Modeling
By Daniel M. McNeish, Laura M. Stapleton, R. Silverman. Psychological methods, 2017
685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e417b917df4914e73e345c33b92889796bfa3943
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Francis L. Huang
- R. Peccei
- Adelien Decramer
- Thomas Van Waeyenberg
- Daniel M. McNeish
- Ji Seung Yang
- Laura M. Stapleton
- Daniel L. Oberski
In Statistics and Probability
- Francis L. Huang
- Daniel M. McNeish
- Ji Seung Yang
- Laura M. Stapleton
- R. Peccei
- Adelien Decramer
- Thomas Van Waeyenberg
- Milica Miočević
Citations in the corpus
- Multilevel and Single-Level Models for Measured and Latent Variables When Data Are Clustered (2016, background): “As argued by McNeish, Stapleton, and Silverman (2016), these alternative methods to multilevel models can be more accessible to researchers because the dependency is accounted for with statistical corrections rather than requiring the researcher to model the dependency with random effects.”
- Analyzing Cross-Sectionally Clustered Data Using Generalized Estimating Equations (2021, methodology): “GEEs, however, are not often used in psychology and education (Norton et al., 1996) even though researchers have highlighted its use as a valid approach for dealing with clustered data (Hardin & Hilbe, 2013; McNeish, 2019; McNeish et al., 2017; Zorn, 2001).”
- Performance management and teacher performance: the role of affective organizational commitment and exhaustion (2020, methodology): “Moreover, while the results can be interpreted identically to singlelevel methods, the estimates are adjusted to reflect the clustering of observations (e.g. McNeish et al., 2017).”