Evaluating the Role of Trust in Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems: An Empirical Analysis
By Shalini Chandra, Shirish C. Srivastava, Yin Leng Theng. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2010
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e40f678f921b2cd7ecf5e818d1d5c0caebcd057a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Michael D. Williams
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Emma L. Slade
- Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas
- Niall Piercy
- Francisco Muñoz-Leiva
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Michael D. Williams
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas
- Emma L. Slade
- Niall Piercy
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Francisco Muñoz-Leiva
In Sociology and Political Science
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Michael D. Williams
- Emma L. Slade
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas
- Niall Piercy
- Francisco Muñoz-Leiva
Citations in the corpus
- An Empirical Examination of Initial Trust in Mobile Banking (2011, background): “Chandra et al. (2010) reported the effect of trust on user adoption of mobile payment systems.”
- Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age (2014, background): “On the other hand, reflecting the increasing importance of trust in mobile commerce (Misra & Wickamasinghe, 2004), trust is proposed in this study as an antecedent variable to the attitude and intention to use a mobile payment (Chandra et al., 2010; Shin, 2009).”
- Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance (2015, unknown): “It is worth noting that prior studies have validated the negative effects of perceived risk on m-payment acceptance (Chandra et al., 2010; Martins et al., 2014).”
- Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions (2024, unknown): “…signi fi cantly affected domains such as healthcare (Benda et al., 2021; Hui et al., 2021; Jacobs et al., 2021; D. K. D. Kim and Kim, 2021a), fi nance (Chandra et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2021; Zierau et al., 2021), personal assistance (Fan et al., 2021b; Pitardi and Marriott, 2021a; Zierau et…”
- User Intentions to Adopt Mobile Payment Services: A Study of Early Adopters in Thailand (2015, background): “…intention, which is inconsistent with many of the findings reported in prior studies on M-payment services adoption based on the TAM approach (Chandra et al., 2010; Chen, 2008; Goeke & Pousttchi, 2010; Keramati et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2012; Zhou, 2011).”
- Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (2019, background): “Brand image (BI) has a significant impact on users’ trust (TRU) of Fintech services.”
- Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments (2014, background): “Chandra et al. (2010) noted that service provider characteristics affect users’ trust.”