Attitudes: Foundations, Functions, and Consequences

By R. Fazio, Michael A. Olson. 2007

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2b4ee38670d8ebf2caf4570e388ae244a4f09ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. M. Hogg
2. Brandi Berry
3. Cixin Wang
4. Susan M. Swearer
5. R. Fazio
6. Bertram Gawronski

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Hogg
2. I. Bakker
3. Jan Boon
4. Joanne R Smith
5. R. Fazio
6. Peter Vink
7. T. Voordt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Hogg
2. Joanne R Smith
3. Scott A. Reid
4. A. Knight
5. R. Kansky
6. Susan M. Swearer
7. R. Fazio
8. Bertram Gawronski

Citations in the corpus

• Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective (2007, background): “…the principal foci of research have varied (McGuire, 1986); for example, attitude measurement (e.g., Likert, 1932; Thurstone, 1928; see also Fazio & Olson, 2003a), attitude change (e.g., Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; see also Crano & Prislin, 2006), attitude – behaviour relations (e.g.,…”
• Reducing Bullying: Application of Social Cognitive Theory (2014, background): “However, it is important to note that attitudes contain cognitive, affective, and behavioral components and reflect a mental state of readiness that influences the likelihood that one will engage in a given behavior in the future (Allport, 1935; Fazio & Olson, 2007).”
• Pleasure, Arousal, Dominance: Mehrabian and Russell revisited (2014, background): “Dominance <-> Potency Mehrabian and Russell (1974) connected dominance to feelings of control and behaviour restrictions caused by physical or social barriers.”
• Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength. (2007, background): “In addition, as Fazio and Olson (2003a) argued, it is characterized by an inherent logical problem.”
• Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms (2006, background): “However, people do not always say what they really think or behave in ways that reflect their underlying attitudes (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; also see Fazio & Olson, 2003); therefore, inferring underlying attitudes from expressed attitudes or overt behavior may be unreliable.”
• Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans (2014, background): “Without such evaluations we would be unable to make daily choices about how to behave (Fazio and Olson, 2012).”