The Dodo Bird Verdict Is Alive and Well—Mostly
By L. Luborsky, R. Rosenthal, L. Diguer, T. Andrusyna, J. Berman, Jill T. Levitt, D. Seligman, Elizabeth D. Krause. 2002
590 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e238f17b31e2eb44e2ac801a26f4cb1b19bb7855
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
- M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
- Bruce F. Chorpita
- P. Hill
- E. Daleiden
- R. Su
- Philip I. Chow
- Jing Luo
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- P. Hill
- M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
- B. Roberts
- M. Höfler
- Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
- Y. Leykin
- Robert J. DeRubeis
- R. Su
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Effects In Psychotherapy: Counterfactuals Counteract Overgeneralization (2010, background): “The fact that the debate on the dodo bird verdict continues (e.g., Butler, Chapman, Forman, & Beck, 2006; Chambless, 2002; Luborsky et al., 2002) shows that causal effects are understood differently by researchers.”
- Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. (2003, background): “For example, considerable disagreement still exists between experts in the domain of child psychotherapy about whether brief and cognitive–behavioral approaches would be more effective than long-term and intensive psychosocial treatments (Luborsky et al., 2002; Weisz, Weiss, Han, Granger, & Morton, ”
- Allegiance in Psychotherapy Outcome Research: Separating Association From Bias (2009, methodology): “…used meta-analytic methods, and they have included pharmacotherapy conditions, a broader sample of psychotherapies, and higher-quality studies than were available to Luborsky et al. (1975; e.g., Gaffan, Tsaousis, & KempWheeler, 1995; Luborsky et al., 1999, 2002; Robinson, Berman, & Neimeyer, 1990).”
- Risk and Anxiety in Adventure Programming (2002, background): “Recent discussion of the power and value of the therapeutic relationship suggests that therapy approaches are very similar in their effectiveness, and that the helping rela tionship is one of the most important factors that is com mon to all approaches (Luborsky et al., 2002).”
- Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials. (2009, background): “The call for an increased focus on issues related to implementation, dissemination, and real-world relevance has grown steadily over the past several years (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005; Kazdin, 2008; National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Child and Adolescent Ment”
- What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning (2011, unknown): “…achievement; Møller and Jennions (2002), focusing on issues in evolutionary biology; Barrick, Mount, and Judge (2001), addressing personality and performance; Peterson (2001), studying college students and social science research; and Luborsky et al. (2002), addressing psychotherapy research.”
- A critique of the American Psychological Association Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Adults. (2020, background): “This appears to be related to the so-called allegiance effects in psychotherapy research (Gaffan, Tsaousis, & Kemp-Wheeler, 1995; Jacobson & Hollon, 1996; Luborsky et al., 2002; Smith, Glass, & Miller, 1980).”
- THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO (2007, background): “…share common components, and one of those is likely to be the kind of self-awareness and behavior monitoring that these aspects of Duluth counseling attempt to promote (for a discussion of this “ dodo bird ” phenomenon in clinical trials of psychotherapy; see Luborsky, Rosenthal, & Diguer, 2002).”
- Evidence-Based Practice: Beyond Empirically Supported Treatments (2004, background): “Meta-analyses (Smith & Glass, 1977; Wampold et al., 1997) and meta-analyses of meta-analyses (called mega-analyses, e.g., Grissom, 1996; Luborsky et al., 2002) have found very few differences among those therapies referred to by Wampold (2001) as bona fide.”
- Identifying and Selecting the Common Elements of Evidence Based Interventions: A Distillation and Matching Model (2005, methodology): “…the same, multiple client types the same, and minimizing possible interactions of interventions and client factors raised numerous problems (e.g., see Beutler, 1991, 2002; Chambless, 2002; Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; King & Ollendick, 1998; Luborsky et al., 2002; Rounsaville & Carroll, 2002).”
- Common Factors in Psychotherapy Outcome: Meta-Analytic Findings and Their Implications for Practice and Research (2004, methodology): “Meta-analyses and reviews of psychotherapy have suggested that common factors are more important to positive outcome than are specific techniques (Ahn & Wampold, 2001; Hubble, Duncan, & Miller, 1999; Lambert & Bergin, 1994; Luborsky et al, 2002; Wampold, 2001).”
- A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008, background): “In this respect, therapist and=or researcher allegiance (Luborsky et al., 2002) might significantly affect any examination of effectiveness and influence ratings.”
- A Systematic Review of Personality Trait Change Through Intervention (2017, background): “Clinical research has consistently found that type of therapy is not strongly associated with differences in the efficacy of therapy (Luborsky et al., 2002).”