THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH SUPPORT FOR THE DULUTH MODEL: A REPLY TO DUTTON AND CORVO

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: A Proposal for Evidence-Based Standards in the United States (2016, background): “…recent research demonstrating that males and females do not differ in their use of controlling behaviors in close relationships (Bates et al., 2014; Graham-Kevan & Archer, 2009), countering claims from some researchers that women’s use of IPV is defensive and noncoercive in nature (Gondolf, 2007).”
Evaluation of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Domestic Violence Offenders (2017, background): “…arrests for domestic violence, sanctions against noncompliance to court orders, support and safety planning for victims, and referral to other agencies with collaborative approaches (e.g., family court, child protection services, alcohol and drug treatment, mental health treatment; Gondolf, 2007).”
The weak evidence for batterer program alternatives (2011, background): “(see Dutton & Corvo 2006, and Gondolf 2007, for a review of the effectiveness debate and an illustration of its intensity.)”
Effects of Motivational Enhancement on Immediate Outcomes of Batterer Intervention (2011, background): “Advocacy from BIP service providers has also prompted greater coordination of community services to help promote men’s change and women’s safety (Gondolf 2007; Mankowski et al. 2002).”