Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood.

By M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, F. Juffer. Psychological bulletin, 2003

1,921 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Is early preventive intervention effective in enhancing parental sensitivity and infant attachment security, and if so, what type of intervention is most successful? Seventy studies were traced, producing 88 intervention effects on sensitivity (n = 7,636) and/or attachment (n = 1,503). Randomized interventions appeared rather effective in changing insensitive parenting (d = 0.33) and infant attachment insecurity (d = 0.20). The most effective interventions used a moderate number of sessions and a clear-cut behavioral focus in families with, as well as without, multiple problems. Interventions that were more effective in enhancing parental sensitivity were also more effective in enhancing attachment security, which supports the notion of a causal role of sensitivity in shaping attachment.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/467e34a74b1e24a20278eae68911194d7b77cc43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Phillip R. Shaver
  2. Mario Mikulincer
  3. Omri Gillath
  4. C. Dunst
  5. C. Trivette
  6. J. Belsky
  7. D. Cicchetti
  8. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn

In Demography

  1. Phillip R. Shaver
  2. Mario Mikulincer
  3. Omri Gillath
  4. C. Dunst
  5. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
  6. M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
  7. Danielle Z. Kassow
  8. Rae Thomas

In Social Psychology

  1. Phillip R. Shaver
  2. Mario Mikulincer
  3. Omri Gillath
  4. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
  5. J. Belsky
  6. R. Fearon
  7. M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
  8. C. Dunst

Citations in the corpus