Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size.

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Construct Validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the Nomological Network (2013, unknown): “…exceeds .80; Kelly, 1999; Leary, 1997; Leary & Cottrell, 2001) and has been used fruitfully in several studies (e.g., Carvallo & Pelham, 2006; De Cremer & Leonardelli, 2003; Gardner, Pickett, & Knowles, 2005; Pickett et al., 2004; Reichl, Schneider, & Spinath, 2013; Walker, Green,…”
Different wrongs, different remedies? Reactions to organizational remedies after procedural and interactional injustice. (2006, methodology): “Based on the work of De Cremer and his colleagues (e.g., De Cremer, 2002; De Cremer & Alberts, 2004; De Cremer & Leonardelli, 2003, De Cremer & Tyler, 2005) we argue that individuals also seek to maintain a sense of belonging to important groups.”
Am I Respected or Not?: Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership (2005, background): “Moreover, across a series of studies, this scale has shown to be reliable and predictive of people’s reactions toward social and relational information (see also De Cremer and Leonardelli, 2003; De Cremer and Alberts, 2004).”
How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong (2010, unknown): “For example, De Cremer and Leonardelli (2003) showed that people with a high dispositional need to belong focused more on the collective interest of the group in large-group social dilemmas.”