The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology

By Jonathan Haidt. Science, 2007

2,143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddc20bb5fc6692933bb2799011b39c353120431a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences (2013, background): “…literature demonstrating fundamental differences between liberals and conservatives with respect to their views of morality (Graham et al., 2009; Haidt, 2007; Haidt, Political Psychology, Vol. xx, No. xx, 2012 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00922.x bs_bs_banner 1 0162-895X © 2012 International…”
Can Sustainable Investing Save the World? Reviewing the Mechanisms of Investor Impact (2020, background): “If so, excluding certain industries that are perceived as “dirty” may be perfectly consistent with an investor’s motivation, even if it has no impact on the excluded industries (see, e.g., Haidt, 2007).”
South Korean Salespersons’ Calling, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (2016, background): “Humans have two fundamental motives, self-interest motives and social interest motives (Haidt, 2007), and seek an optimal balance between the costs and benefits of their behaviors and traits (Nettle, 2006).”
The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014, methodology): “…as morally wrong, we combined the two wrongness ratings and entered the resulting composite as a dependent variable in a multiple regression analysis with demographic variables (age, sex, education, income), political ideology (social and fiscal), individualising and binding moral values,…”
Do cultural values predict individuals' moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multilevel approach (2011, background): “Haidt (2008) categorized these moral foundations into two overarching moral systems, or two ways of suppressing selfishness, respectively.”
Approach, Ability, Aftermath: A Psychological Process Framework of Unethical Behavior at Work (2015, background): “This is important to clarify, as disciplinary psychologists tend to use the term “moral” (Doris & Cushman, 2010; Haidt, 2007), while organizational researchers seem more comfortable with the term “ethical” (Jones, 1991; Tenbrunsel & Smith-Crowe, 2008; Treviño, 1986).”
Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation (2009, background): “First, whereas previous explicit measures of political orientation used the labels ‘‘liberal” and ‘‘conservative” (e.g., Haidt, 2007; Haidt & Graham, 2007), we used the labels ‘‘left” and ‘‘right.””
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, neutral): “In so doing, it will become evident that moral intuitions are not based on asocial principles of right actions, such as prohibitions against intentionally causing harm (Hauser, 2006; Mikhail, 2007; Turiel, 1983) and inequality (Turiel, 1983) or concerns with “purity” (Haidt, 2007).”
Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms (2011, background): “Research from various disciplines suggests that moral thinking helps us resolve fundamental collective action problems and coordinate behavior with other agents (Gintis, Bowles, Boyd, & Fehr, 2005; Haidt, 2007).”
Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology (2007, background): “The only way to maintain these two positions is by claiming that modern multilevel selection theory bears no relationship to its own past (e.g., Keller 1999; West et al. 2006, 2007).”
Consumer response to corporate irresponsible behavior: Moral emotions and virtues (2013, background): “Psychologists have shown that ethical and social transgressions engender negative emotional reactions in people and function to link violations of moral standards to moral behaviors (e.g., Haidt, 2001, 2007; Tangney, Stuewig and Mashek, 2007).”
Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire (2018, background): “What is morality? What explains its content and structure? And how is it best measured? In recent years, the study of morality has become the focus of a thriving interdisciplinary endeavour, encompassing research not only in psychology, but also in evolutionary theory, genetics, biology, animal beha”
My Anger Is Your Gain, My Contempt Your Loss: Explaining Consumer Responses to Corporate Wrongdoing (2013, background): “…morality (Turiel, 1983), which emphasize concerns about individuals directly harming and unfairly treating others, and (b) recent theoretical approaches on morality, which take a broad view on ethical behavior (e.g., Haidt, 2007; Haidt, Koller, & Dias, 1993; Shweder, Much, Mahapatra, & Park, 1997).”
Character, Conformity, or the Bottom Line? How and Why Downsizing Affected Corporate Reputation (2009, background): “Scholars have argued that individuals react to such displays at an emotional and preconscious level (Frank, 1988; Haidt, 2007; Hauser, 2006; Nesse, 2001).”
Morality, culture and the dialogic self: taking cultural pluralism seriously (2008, background): “A second example is Hume's view of moral emotions as primary reactions too quick to be accounted for by reasoning, a view now being revived in psychology and given an evolutionary twist (Haidt, 2001 , 2007 ).”