Do cultural values predict individuals' moral attitudes? A cross-cultural multilevel approach

By C. Vauclair, Ronald Fischer. 2011

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e61b0cb923c16c3e91811f037904a488391951fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. V. Blagoev
2. G. Hofstede
3. Irem Uz
4. Michael Minkov
5. C. Leach
6. Stefano Pagliaro

In Social Psychology

1. Michael Minkov
2. Stefano Pagliaro
3. G. Hofstede
4. R. Bilali
5. V. Blagoev
6. Irem Uz
7. C. Leach
8. Martijn van Zomeren

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael Minkov
2. Stefano Pagliaro
3. G. Hofstede
4. R. Bilali
5. V. Blagoev
6. Irem Uz
7. C. Leach
8. Martijn van Zomeren

Citations in the corpus

• GROUPS AND MORALITY (2014, background): “In a different approach, Vauclair and Fischer (2011) had large samples in 56 countries indicate how “justified” they believed 10 moral behaviors to be.”
• The Index of Cultural Tightness and Looseness Among 68 Countries (2015, methodology): “Based on Vauclair and Fischer (2011) and Minkov et al. (2013), tolerance for personal-sexual deviations, compared with tolerance for violation of legal rules, was expected to be more closely related with cultural looseness (see Supplemental Materials for more details).”
• The Boundaries of Culture (2013, methodology): “Ten of these items were analyzed by Vauclair and Fischer (2011) in an attempt to find whether cultural values predict individuals’ moral attitudes. Using pooled individual-level data from WVS waves between 1981 and 2004, Vauclair and Fischer obtained and reported two clearly distinguished individual”