Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms
By David Tannenbaum, E. Uhlmann, Daniel Diermeier. 2011
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/711ff6b893df7a914a2819cef85e03978b47e414
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Liane L. Young
- Fiery Cushman
- Adam Waytz
- Kurt Gray
- Lily Tsoi
- Rebecca Saxe
- Joshua D. Greene
- Jorie Koster-Hale
In Social Psychology
- Liane L. Young
- Adam Waytz
- Fiery Cushman
- Kurt Gray
- Lily Tsoi
- Rebecca Saxe
- Joshua D. Greene
- Nicholas Epley
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality (2012, background): “Second, at the level of the individual, morality concerns character —how we judge not specific acts but the agents who perform them (Alicke, 2000 ; Pizarro & Tannenbaum, 2011 ; Tannenbaum, Uhlmann, & Diermeier, in press ).”
- When Mental States Matter, When They Don't, and What That Means for Morality (2013, background): “…judgments in the case of self-directed actions (e.g., defiling oneself reflects poorly on one’s moral character) and harsh “moral action” judgments in the case of other-directed actions (e.g., hurting someone else is an immoral act; cf. Pizarro & Tannenbaum, 2011; Tannenbaum et al., 2011).”
- Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality (2015, background): “For instance, people judge a wealthy individual to have an impoverished moral character if he chooses to engrave his face on a marble tabletop; yet, they do not consider this action to be morally impermissible [28].”