On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review

By Peter Kruyen, W. Emons, Klaas Sijtsma. 2013

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd7164dfd4d1b70b8886f4d2861bee19ebd6bf45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. G. Notelaers

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. G. Notelaers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Pascale Peters
2. G. Notelaers
3. Staale Einarsen
4. M. B. Nielsen
5. Hans De Witte
6. A. Skogstad
7. Elfi Baillien

Citations in the corpus

• Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument (2018, methodology): “Kruyen et al. (2013) speculated that many researchers are unaware of the fact that measurement precision might significantly decrease when a shortened test is used, also when the reliability is not that much affected (see also Sijtsma & Emons, 2011). Furthermore, they noted that both construct and p”