Test Scaling and Value-Added Measurement
By D. Ballou. Education Finance and Policy, 2009
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd1d9c9ee661754c3848f22472ac21bb80688970
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Hanley S. Chiang
- Daniel F McCaffrey
- J. R. Lockwood
- Derek C. Briggs
- Stephen Raudenbush
- Sean F. Reardon
- Peter Z. Schochet
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Daniel F McCaffrey
- J. R. Lockwood
- Hanley S. Chiang
- Derek C. Briggs
- Stephen Raudenbush
- Sean F. Reardon
- Peter Z. Schochet
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Hanley S. Chiang
- Daniel F McCaffrey
- J. R. Lockwood
- Derek C. Briggs
- Stephen Raudenbush
- Sean F. Reardon
- Peter Z. Schochet
Citations in the corpus
- Error Rates in Measuring Teacher and School Performance Based on Student Test Score Gains (2010, background): “…the extent of estimator bias (Kane and Staiger 2008; Rothstein 2010; Koedel and Betts 2009), the scaling of test scores used in the estimates (Ballou 2009; Briggs and Weeks 2009), the degree to which the estimates reflect students' future benefits from their current teachers' instruction…”
- Assumptions of Value-Added Models for Estimating School Effects (2009, background): “In the case of cognitive skill, however, it is unclear what the reference metric should (or could) be (Ballou, 2008).”
- Teacher Quality in Educational Production. Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement. NBER Working Paper No. 14442. (2008, unknown): “30 While several 30 Although a full discussion is beyond the scope of this paper, assumptions about " decay " are closely related to issues of test scaling and content coverage (Rothstein, 2008; Ballou, 2008; Martineau, 2006).”
- Correcting for Test Score Measurement Error in ANCOVA Models for Estimating Treatment Effects (2014, background): “‘‘Vertical’’ or ‘‘developmental’’ scales are designed to have this property, but psychometricians caution that such scales might not live up to the ideal (Reckase, 2004; Schafer, 2006) and that inferences about the impacts of educational factors on student progress can be sensitive to scale properti”
- Knowledge, Tests, and Fadeout in Educational Interventions (2012, unknown): “Our estimates of w in the NLSY79 are consistent with Neal and Johnson’s (1996) findings that performance on the Armed Forces Qualifying Test as an adolescent explains roughly 15 percent of variation in earnings.”
- Measuring Growth With Vertical Scales (2013, background): “10 A major takeaway from this example is that, in contrast to more pessimistic assertions (Ballou, 2009; Cliff, 1992; Yen, 1986; Zwick, 1992), testing an equal-interval hypothesis is not an impossible or an insurmountably difficult task. The theory of conjoint measurement provides the means by which”
- Linking Teacher Quality, Student Attendance, and Student Achievement (2016, unknown): “CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND PREVIOUS LITERATURE Chetty et al. (2011) found small transitory effects of kindergarten classrooms on cognitive development (i.”