Error Rates in Measuring Teacher and School Performance Based on Student Test Score Gains

By Peter Z. Schochet, Hanley S. Chiang. 2010

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7761fe9b3806f5e7713a22f353fcc8b7013a7486

Citations in the corpus

• Teacher Self-Efficacy, Professional Commitment, and High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation Policy in Louisiana (2017, unknown): “…2006; Day, Simmons, & Gu, 2008; DiPaola & Hoy, 2008; Green, Baker, & Oluwole, 2012; Haertel, 2013; Jennings & Corcoran, 2009; McCaffrey, Koretz, Lockwood, & Hamilton, 2003; Milner, 2013; National Association of Secondary School Principals [NASSP], 2014; Papay, 2011; Schochet & Chiang, 2010).”
• The Legal Consequences of Mandating High Stakes Decisions Based on Low Quality Information: Teacher Evaluation in the Race-to-the-Top Era (2013, unknown): “…unstable from year to year, and have very wide error ranges when applied to individual teachers, making confident distinctions between " good " and " bad " teachers difficult if not impossible (Baker et al., 2010; McCaffrey, Sass, Lockwood, & Mihaly, 2009; Sass, 2008; Schochet & Chiang, 2010).”