Do Leadership Training and Development Make a Difference in the Public Sector? A Panel Study

By Brett Seidle, Sergio Fernandez, J. Perry. 2016

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcdde79b387f299339e8b1bdfe8245cf0cea25b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. G. Schwarz
2. N. Eva
3. Alexander Newman

In Education

1. G. Schwarz
2. N. Eva
3. Alexander Newman

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. N. Eva
2. Alexander Newman
3. G. Schwarz
4. J. Bryson
5. B. Crosby
6. Bert Enserink
7. J. Koppenjan

Citations in the corpus

• Can Public Leadership Increase Public Service Motivation and Job Performance? (2020, methodology): “Combining classroom instruction with coaching, the provision of multisource feedback and experiential training has been found to be a particularly helpful training method to improve leadership and organizational outcomes (Seidle, Fernandez, and Perry 2016).”
• Why leadership of public leadership research matters: and what to do about it (2018, background): “Seidle, Fernandez, and Perry (2016), for example, found positive effects on individual and organizational performance as a result of a leadership development programme featuring combination of in-class instruction, peer feedback, coaching, and action learning.”