The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other.

By A. Sameroff. 2009

1,122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daeae4cb14faefa28f2dade50adee92a41098f50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A unified theory of development: a dialectic integration of nature and nurture. (2010, background): “In a recent book on the topic (Sameroff, 2009), a number of researchers documented transactional processes in cognitive and social-emotional domains where agents in the family, school, and cultural contexts altered the course of children’s development in both positive and negative directions.”
Children’s Creativity: A Theoretical Framework and Systematic Review (2018, background): “…or the environment directly and one-sidedly “steering” creative processes (opponents of the Darwinian perspective), person and context actually shape each other through their continuous transactions over time (Fogel, 2009; Howe & Lewis, 2005; A. Sameroff, 2009; A. J. Sameroff & Chandler, 1975).”
Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure?: A one-year follow-up investigation (2013, background): “A molecular approach (5- or 10-min rating periods) could look for within-class period trends in teachers’ motivating styles, and it could also employ transactional models (Sameroff, 2009) to investigate how in-class changes in students’ classroommotivation, engagement, cooperation, or performance mi”
Parental Educational Expectations and Academic Achievement in Children and Adolescents—a Meta-analysis (2019, result): “These results are in line with transactional and bidirectional models of human development (Bell 1968; Sameroff 2009).”
Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters (2015, background): “Indeed, because of the dynamic transactions between the individual and environment, “the transactional model emphasizes discontinuities” (Sameroff, 2009, p. 17)— a hallmark of intra- and inter-individual variance and heterogeneity.”
Adding ‘Flock’ to ‘Fight and Flight’: A Honeycomb of Resilience Where Supply of Relationships Meets Demand for Support (2012, background): “I use RRR to explain how relationships can reconfigure a risk ecology: how individuals can engage collectively in bidirectional (Lerner, 2006; Ungar, 2011), transactional (Sameroff, 2009) processes so that an ecology can support positive adjustment.”