A random nth-price auction
By Jason F. Shogren, Michael Margolis, C. Koo, John A. List. 2001
302 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa4d33d04ffff4f1917d3bfb0c147db131553a5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Jason F. Shogren
- Ted C. Schroeder
- Charles N. Noussair
- Stéphane Robin
- B. Ruffieux
- John A. List
- T. Feldkamp
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Jason F. Shogren
- Melissa L. Moore
- Marine Le Gall-Ely
- John A. List
- W. Huffman
- R. Vecchio
- Jackson Loomis
In Safety Research
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Jason F. Shogren
- Charles N. Noussair
- John A. List
- Imran Rasul
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Ernst Fehr
- Simon Gächter
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France (2004, background): “Subjects with valuations far away from the market price may decide to bid zero in a WTP auction once they find out they have no chance of winning (Shogren et al., 2001b).”
- Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods : Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? (2006, background): “This feature assures a greater involvement of participant submitting very low bids (off margin bidders) who face a very low probability of winning and making real payments in standard Vickrey auctions ( Shogren, Margolis, Koo, & List, 2001 ).”
- Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation of Quality Differentiated Goods (2004, background): “Yes, with multiple rounds Yes, with multiple rounds Yes No References Vickrey, Shogren et al. (2001b) Shogren et al. (2001b) Vickrey; Coppinger, Smith, and Titus Becker, DeGroot, and Marschak; Irwin et al. Becker, DeGroot, and Marschak introduced the BDM mechanism as a way to induce individuals to t”
- Revealing consumers' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction (2004, background): “Shogren et al. (2001) compare bidder behavior in the random kth price auction and the second price sealed bid auction.”
- Definition, Measurement and Determinants of the Consumer's Willingness to Pay: A Critical Synthesis and Avenues for Further Research (2009, background): “Theoretically, a rational bidder is encouraged to reveal his real WTP, thus limiting the occurrence of strategic bias (McAfee and McMillan, 1987; Kagel, 1995; Shogren et al 2001).”
- Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA (2001, background): “See Shogren et al. (1994b) for some evidence that the second-price auction seems relatively robust in revealing non-induced preferences given alternative configurations of format and complexity.”
- The Effects of Prior Beliefs and Learning on Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods (2007, background): “The random nth-price auction mechanism has been shown to be superior to a 2nd-price Vickery auction for eliciting consumers’ entire demand curve for new goods (Shogren et al., 2001).”
- Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food (2007, unknown): “Thus, the random nth price auction does a better job of keeping all bidders engaged in the auction relative to other demand revealing auctions like the Vickery auction and the BDM (Shogren et al. 2001, Lusk and Rousu).”
- Preference Elicitation under Oath (2010, unknown): “Here off-the-margin bidders tend to over-bid if they perceive their induced value is far removed from the potential market clearing price in a real auction (see for example, Shogren et al., 2001; Knetsch et al., 2001).”
- Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It? (2002, unknown): “4This is the traceability portion of TT A. 5 Subject engagement in the auction was one reason behind the use of the random nth-price auction in Shogren et al. (2001).”