Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France

By Jayson L. Lusk, Lisa House, C. Valli, S. Jaeger, Melissa L. Moore, J. Morrow, W. Bruce Traill. 2004

402 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7a24145814e536dfd63325efc33e40ae0384756

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? (2020, background): “Information has been shown to affect consumer acceptance of food produced with novel technologies (Corrigan et al., 2009; Lusk et al. 2004; McFadden, and Huffman, 2017).”
Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, background): “…valuation (e.g. Boccaletti and Nardella, 2000; Gil et al., 2000; Maruyama and Kikuchi, 2004), experimental auctions (Hoffman et al., 1993; Lusk et al., 2001, 2004; Rozan et al., 2004) and conjoint analysis (e.g. Bech-Larsen and Grunert, 2003; Enneking, 2004; Grunert et al., 2004) have…”
Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy (2011, unknown): “Such benefits, it is argued, will lead to less conservative consumer attitudes on biotechnology [9] and a re-innovation of the agricultural sector with associated economic benefits [5 ].”
Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice (2009, background): “…suggest that: (a) there is no evidence of affiliation or round effects with the OECE, and (b) the OECE produced estimates of information effects on WTP that are more consistent with existing auction studies (e.g., Tegene et al. 2003; Lusk et al. 2004; Rousu et al. 2005; Huffman et al. 2007).”
Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance--a review. (2008, unknown): “GMO food, irradiated food) compared to American consumers (Bech-Larsen & Grunert, 2003; Lusk et al., 2004; Lusk & Rozan, 2005).”
The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics (2019, background): “However, opinions about GMO foods are not correlated with political ideology, but rather are (positively) correlated with (lower) education, (female) gender, and (higher) perceptions that genetic engineering is unethical or immoral (Elder, Greene, & Lizotte, 2018; Lusk et al., 2004).”
Non-sensory factors in sensory science research (2006, background): “In this study (Lusk et al., 2004; Jaeger et al., 2004) participants were asked to state the monetary compensation (i.”
Willingness-to-pay for food safety: an experimental investigation of quality certification on bidding behaviour (2004, background): “…been successfully applied to value food safety (i.e, Buhr et al., 1993; Hayes et al., 1995; Melton et al. 1996; Shin et al., 1992; Fox et al., 1998; Lusk et al., 2004), and it has been claimed that experimental data can provide estimates comparable to contingent valuation data (Shogren, 1993).”
Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union (2004, unknown): “Lusk et al. (2004) found subjective knowledge significantly affected respondents’ bid levels in an experimental auction when information about the benefits of genetic modification were introduced to auction participants.”
The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food — A meta-analysis (2009, background): “Second, consumer valuation strongly varies with country or region (Lusk et al., 2003, 2004).”