Preference Elicitation under Oath
By N. Jacquemet, Robert-Vincent Joule, Stéphane Luchini, Jason F. Shogren. 2010
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/778fc7debcf7d96808b3dea30419f67ac8e31fa2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- John M. Rose
- Riccardo Scarpa
- N. Hanley
- David A. Hensher
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- Jackson Loomis
- Kevin J. Boyle
- Emily Lancsar
In Safety Research
- Jackson Loomis
- Emily Lancsar
- Wiktor L. Adamowicz
- John M. Rose
- Christian A. Vossler
- Harmen Oppewal
- Wuyang Hu
- R. Johnston
In Sociology and Political Science
- Riccardo Scarpa
- John M. Rose
- Roy Brouwer
- M. Ryan
- Wiktor L. Adamowicz
- Jackson Loomis
- Roger Tourangeau
- Christian A. Vossler
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “Development of correction methods has continued, with recent approaches including the solemn oath (Jacquemet et al. 2013), Bayesian truth serum (Barrage and Lee 2010; Weaver and Prelec 2013), honest priming (de-Magistris, Gracia, and Nayga 2013), and religious priming (Stachtiaris et al.”
- Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, background): “Jacquemet et al. (2013) were the first to report applications of oath scripts as a method of removing HB and found that taking the oath made people bid more sincerely in a hypothetical second-price auction, even more so than they did under monetary incentives.”
- 2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys (2014, methodology): “For example, an ex ante method such as “cheap talk” can be used with another ex ante method, such as the oath in Jacquemet et al. (2013). Even combining ex ante and ex post approaches is feasible (Whitehead and Cherry, 2007).”
- Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…are willing to take an oath of honesty, and (d) respondents’ environmental beliefs or attitudes (Champ et al. 1997; Champ and Bishop 2001; Blumenschein et al. 2008; Blomquist, Blumenschein, and Johannesson 2009; Herriges et al. 2010; Ready, Champ, and Lawton 2010; Jacquemet et al. 2013, 2016).”