Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries

By Sonia Livingstone, L. Haddon, Anke Görzig, Kjartan Ólafsson. 2011

968 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da6a13f1e9d0be57baca22dd2c2a26728e0d3925

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries (2011, background): “Also, although we find higher victimization rates among female youth, the cyberbullying perpetration rates among male and female youth across Europe are not consistent (Livingstone et al., 2011).”
Determinants of Internet Mediation: (2013, background): “Dutch parents rank among the highest in Europe to employ active internet mediation styles, whereas for restrictive mediation andmonitoring they have average scores, and for using parental controls they fall somewhat above the European average (Livingstone et al., 2011).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “Regarding cybervictims, Livingstone et al. (2011) found that the biggest risk factor of being bullied online was to bully others online.”
Peer Influence, Internet use and Cyberbullying: A Comparison of Different Context Effects among German Adolescents (2013, methodology): “Finally, from the large variety of different model specifications, as detailed by Marsden and Friedkin (1993) as well as Leenders (2002), we only selected the two most typical designs and did not consider the networkdisturbances model or different weight matrices.”
Boobs, back-off, six packs and bits: Mediated body parts, gendered reward, and sexual shame in teens' sexting images (2015, background): “Quantitative research has defined ‘sexting’ in rather vague ways such as receiving or sending ‘sexually suggestive, nude, or near nude images’ (Lenhart 2009) and ‘talk about having sex or images of people naked or having sex’ (Livingstone et al. 2011).”
Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders' behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully (2014, background): “Nowadays, social network sites (SNS) are very popular amongst teenagers (Lenhart, Madden, Macgill, & Smith, 2007; Livingstone et al., 2011), and we can see that these sites form a common venue for cyberbullying (Livingstone et al., 2011; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2008).”
Connected and concerned: Variation in parents' online safety concerns (2013, background): “, 2010) and these play a central role in the EU Kids Online Report as well (Livingstone et al., 2011).”
Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: differences by participant role (2012, result): “In terms of traditional bullying this is broadly in line with the findings of other studies (Livingstone et al. 2011; Perren et al. 2010; Ortega et al. 2009).”