Peer Influence, Internet use and Cyberbullying: A Comparison of Different Context Effects among German Adolescents

By Ruth Festl, Michael Scharkow, Thorsten Quandt. 2013

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f92da3ceb08bc93d8e5b8c88e1d3de5b31f26b49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Shirley S. Ho
2. May Oo Lwin
3. Heidi Vandebosch
4. Liang Chen

In Education

1. Shirley S. Ho
2. May Oo Lwin
3. Heidi Vandebosch
4. Sara Pabian
5. Liang Chen

In Social Psychology

1. Shirley S. Ho
2. May Oo Lwin
3. Heidi Vandebosch
4. Sara Pabian
5. Liang Chen

Citations in the corpus

• A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach (2017, background): “In another study included in our meta-analysis, Festl et al. (2013) explored the influence of frequency of ICT use on cyberbullying by focusing on academic track school students.”
• Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions (2014, background): “Based on literature on the importance of peers during adolescence (Kindermann, Zimmer-Gembeck, & Duffy, 2010) and the role of group dynamics in cyberbullying (Festl et al., 2013), we expect the influence of peers to be greater than that of adults.”