Coevolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change

By J. Bergh, Sigrid Stagl. 2003

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d98a61ff5551d14949e3aa85fc91c852c9f088b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. D. Antonioli
2. S. Mancinelli
3. R. Norgaard
4. Peter T. Ward
5. M. Mazzanti
6. Niki Frantzeskaki
7. Jan Rotmans
8. F. Avelino

In Safety Research

1. R. Norgaard
2. M. Mazzanti
3. Derk A. Loorbach

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Norgaard
2. Peter T. Ward
3. M. Mazzanti
4. Jan Rotmans
5. F. Avelino
6. G. Kallis
7. Derk A. Loorbach

Citations in the corpus

• Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies (2013, background): “HPWP and HRM practices, as intended here, are intertwined firm’s components, which, in a process of co-evolution and adaptation (Van den Bergh and Stagl, 2003), influence each other and impact the firm’s innovative performance.”
• Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics (2007, unknown): “The strict meaning of coevolution is that two populations with internal diversity interact in such a way that they influence each others selection environment, so that their evolutionary patterns are coupled (van den Bergh and Stagl, 2003).”
• Impact of Information Technology Integration and Lean/Just-In-Time Practices on Lead-Time Performance (2006, background): “Institutional theory suggests that organizations become more and more similar over time because the similar external institutional forces reward the similarity (Jepperson, 1991; North, 1991).”
• Coevolutionary ecological economics (2010, background): “…of technologies and institutions (Nelson, 2002), populations of industries and universities (Murmann, 2003), behaviors and institutions (van den Bergh and Stagl, 2003), populations of producers and consumers, or supply–demand coevolution (Safarzynska and van den Bergh, in press; Janssen…”
• Complexity and Transition Management (2009, background): “In the biological or economic context, coevolution refers to mutual selection of two or more evolving populations (van den Bergh and Stagl 2004).”
• Bridging ecological and social systems coevolution: A review and proposal (2010, background): “More recently, Van den Bergh and Stagl (2003) have pointed to the potential of coevolution as an analytical framework to study institutions and institutional change and its links to biological evolution.”
• Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change (2017, background): “It is based on the notion that innovation itself is a systemic process whereby, for example, technological innovation interacts with social and institutional changes in a coevolutionary way, meaning that through their interaction the interacting elements themselves also change (42, 43).”