Coevolutionary ecological economics

By G. Kallis, R. Norgaard. 2010

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ea2abd6250ef1b13be8d739a3a39014264bb9a4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Huiwen Gong
2. G. Kallis
3. S. Manning
4. C. Spash
5. T. Foxon
6. Piero Morseletto
7. Frank Boons
8. O. V. Hagen

In Safety Research

1. C. Spash
2. Piero Morseletto
3. T. Foxon
4. S. Manning
5. Juliane Reinecke
6. O. V. Hagen
7. Frank Boons
8. Alex Y. Lo

Citations in the corpus

• National Contexts Matter: The Co-Evolution of Sustainability Standards in Global Value Chains (2012, methodology): “Co-evolution means that entities which are part of a larger system influence each other’s evolution (Kallis & Norgaard, 2010, Lewin & Volberda, 1999).”
• Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: towards a theoretical framework (2018, background): “…of organizations/ firms and supporting institutions (Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010), of technology, industry structure and institutions (Blankenberg & Buenstorf, 2016; Nelson, 1995), of socio-technical transitions (Geels, 2014), and of social and ecological systems (Kallis & Norgaard, 2010).”
• Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth to Stay within Planetary Boundaries? (2012, background): “…C.J.M. van den Bergh and Giorgos Kallis Somewhat in parallel to institutional economics, there has been the development of the interdisciplinary field of ecological economics, which tends to see the economy as coevolving, rather than simply growing (Daly and Farley 2004; Kallis and Norgaard 2010).”
• The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, background): “Others have emphasised the importance of the co-evolution of social, economic and natural systems (Gowdy, 1994; Kallis and Norgaard, 2010; Norgaard, 1994), and complexity leading to recognition of emergent properties (Kay et al., 1999).”
• Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy (2020, background): “This would require facilitating greater collaborative activity between the CE and RE communities, possibly promoting a coevolutionary research agenda (see Kallis & Norgaard, 2010; Norgaard, 2006).”
• A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy (2011, background): “This paper responds to the call for the application of coevolutionary approaches within ecological economics, focussing on the theme of overcoming unsustainable lock-in to carbon-based systems of production and consumption (Kallis and Norgaard, 2010).”
• Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands) (2015, background): “There is mounting evidence to support the claim that system-wide transformations are of key importance in order to address climate change and achieve a low-carbon economy [2–5]; The challenge, however, is that the innovation necessary for systemic change tends to be incremental and (path) dependent ”