Acquire or Ally? -- A Strategy Framework for Deciding between Acquisition and Cooperation
By W. Hoffmann, Wulf Schaper-Rinkel. 2001
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d61c20af1505d8555768dad27197d7ebd6731a30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Haibin Yang
- Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke
- Zhiang Lin
- Geert Duysters
- Vareska Van de Vrande
- A. Cozzolino
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Ya Lin
Citations in the corpus
- Discontinuities, competition, and cooperation: Coopetitive dynamics between incumbents and entrants (2018, background): “…IP regime is weak, rather than allying with new entrants, we expect incumbents to focus on internal R&D in order to enhance their absorptive capacity (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990) and to acquire new upstream entrants (Capron & Mitchell, 2012; Hoffmann & Schaper-Rinkel, 2001; Rothaermel & Hess, 2007).”
- External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice (2007, background): “M&As represent the highest level of hierarchy and are defined as ‘cumulative ownership of 50 percent or more of a partner firm’ (Folta, 1998).”
- A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes (2010, background): “Researchers have identified various factors that drive the choices between each pair, such as characteristics in environment, transaction, and firm idiosyncratic nature (Folta, 1998; Hagedoorn and Duysters, 2002; Hoffmann and Schaper-Rinkel, 2001).”