Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change

By Zoe Richards, Miles Hewstone. 2001

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d5e150e2c00ac062f7ca5e06ef29689c32dbda6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Implicit Attitudes Toward Arab-Muslims and the Moderating Effects of Social Information (2007, background): “Another possible solution might be leading people to subtype or subgroup ( Richards & Hewstone, 2001 ) in a subcategory the Arab-Muslim terrorists, who do not represent the entire Arab-Muslim populations.”
How Stereotypes Are Shared Through Language: A Review and Introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) Framework (2019, background): “They can range from superordinate broad levels (e.g., gender, age groups, racial and ethnic groups), to more narrow subordinate levels of aggregation (e.g., specific and specialized professions; Richards & Hewstone, 2001).”
Combatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework (2018, background): “Sometimes, for example, women are subtyped and seen as exceptional and not representative of women in general (Richards & Hewstone, 2001), all of which would not bring about change in how women in general are viewed.”
Psychological Reactions to Crime News Portrayals of Black Criminals: Understanding the Moderating Roles of Prior News Viewing and Stereotype Endorsement (2006, background): “For example, scholars have conceptualized racial attitudes as relatively stable belief systems that are in fact largely resistant to change (Hewstone, Hopkins, & Routh, 1992; Hewstone, Macrae, Griffiths, Milne, & Brown, 1994; Johnston & Hewstone, 1990; Park, Wolsko, & Judd, 2000; Richards & Hewston”
Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction (2009, background): “Models of subtyping and subgrouping (Richards & Hewstone, 2001) can also be viewed as instances of category integration, to the extent that they are defined by conjunctions of categorical identities (see also Hutter & Crisp, 2005; Kunda, Miller, & Claire, 1990).”
Ethnic Discrimination in the Dutch Labor Market (2012, background): “Alternatively, absence of intergroup differences might be explained by a process of subtyping (Richards & Hewstone, 2001): When individual members of a minority group deviate markedly from the prevailing stereotype of that group, they are not regarded as being a member of that group, but as a…”
Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times (2018, neutral): “36 Richards and Hewstone 2001.”
Thinking Well of African Americans: Measuring Complimentary Stereotypes and Negative Prejudice (2006, methodology): “1In their distinction between subtyping and subgrouping, Richards and Hewstone (2001) described subtypes as a cluster of individuals who dis-”
Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “In the stereotyping literature, a great deal of work has investigated the hypothesis that representations of basic-level social categories, which seem so useful for everyday distinction-making, are protected from modification by a process of subtyping (e.g., Richards & Hewstone, 2001).”
Paternalistic and Envious Gender Stereotypes: Testing Predictions from the Stereotype Content Model (2002, methodology): “the first term is used throughout this paper (see also Richards & Hewstone, 2001 ).”
Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model (2007, background): “Subtyping discounts stereotype-inconsistent members as ‘‘special cases’’ or exceptions, leaving the existing stereotype intact and yielding a rather homogeneous and less complex group representation (see Richards & Hewstone, 2001).”