An Investigation Into the Impact of Coach Leadership and Coach-Athlete Relationship on Group Cohesion.

By S. Jowett, Victoria Chaundy. 2004

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d43e5c09c99af2ece96a08b26c28a01e86904033

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Culture Change in Elite Sport Performance Teams: Examining and Advancing Effectiveness in the New Era (2012, background): “Certainly, significantly challenging practitioners’ ability to package and implement high performing processes, almost all previous research has examined these markers’ correlations with other pertinent variables (e.g., Bray, Beauchamp, Eys, & Carron, 2005; Jowett & Chaundy, 2004;).”
Relationship Maintenance Strategies in the Coach-Athlete Relationship: The Development of the COMPASS Model (2010, background): “Research in this domain has considered athlete-athlete, parent-athlete, and coach-athlete partnerships (e.g., Jowett & Chaundy, 2004; Ullrich-French & Smith, 2006).”
Measurement of Transformational Leadership and its Relationship with Team Cohesion and Performance Level (2009, background): “Indeed, in sport, although coach leadership has been shown to predict task and social cohesion ( Jowett & Chaundy, 2004 ), research investigating transformational leadership has yet to take group dynamic variables such as cohesion into account.”
Empathic Accuracy, Meta-Perspective, and Satisfaction in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2009, background): “This is comparable with previously published results using this measure that ranged from 0.77 to 0.86 (Jowett & Chaundy, 2004).”
Validating Coach-Athlete Relationship Measures with the Nomological Network (2009, background): “A team of researchers over the last decade has concentrated on (a) developing a theoretical network involving propositions that concern the coach-athlete relationship, (b) linking the concept of the coach-athlete relationship and the constructs of which it is comprised to its developed questionnaire”
Relational coaching in sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness (2016, background): “Moreover, coach leadership and coaching relationship variables together were shown to be better and stronger predictors of task cohesion than social cohesion (Jowett & Chaundy, 2004).”
Social Networks in Sport: Parental Influence on the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2005, methodology): “The 3 Cs model has been utilized in qualitative research to examine the content of the coach-athlete relationship (e.g., Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Meek, 2000) and in quantitative research to examine the correlates of the coach-athlete relationship (e.g., Jowett & Chaundy, 2004; Jowett & Don Carolis, ”