Empathic Accuracy, Meta-Perspective, and Satisfaction in the Coach-Athlete Relationship

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic review of social support in youth sport (2014, background): “…31 = Keresztes et al. (2008); 32 = Lafrenière et al. (2011); 33 = Lauer et al. (2010); 34 = Le Bars et al. (2009); 35 = Le Bars et al. (2009); 36 = Lorimer and Jowett (2009); 37 = Lubans, Morgan, and McCormack (2011); 38 = Nicolas et al. (2011); 39 = Philippe et al. (2011); 40 = Power and Woolger…”
Relational coaching in sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness (2016, background): “In another study, Lorimer and Jowett (2009b) found that empathic accuracy (understanding one another) was predictive of both relationship quality and satisfaction with training.”
Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors (2011, methodology): “Moreover, in line with recent work on the coacheathlete relationship (Jowett, 2009; Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2004; Lorimer & Jowett, 2009), scores for each subscale were used as indicators of athletes’ general perceptions of the quality of the relationship with their coach in all structural equation…”
Taking the Next Step: Ways Forward for Coaching Science (2011, background): “Despite (in our view) being too reductionist in nature and reliant on psychometric measures, the work of both Jowett (e.g., Lorimer & Jowett, 2009) and Myers (e.g., Myers, Payment, & Feltz, 2004) on coach-athlete relationships also reinforces the need for coaches to make greater use of knowledge…”