A socioanalytic perspective on person–environment interaction.

By Robert P. Hogan, B. Roberts. 2000

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d303b4afb51aeb3335fbd903dace1a9f41241e90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Back
2. L. Penke
3. Jaap J. A. Denissen
4. C. Wrzus
5. P. Armstrong
6. O. Chernyshenko
7. J. Rounds
8. R. Su

Citations in the corpus

• Personality Development and Organizational Behavior (2006, background): “It was misguided because in hindsight, all of the arguments made against personality traits were either factually or interpretively incorrect (Hogan & Roberts, 2000; Roberts, 2005).”
• Holland's RIASEC Model as an Integrative Framework for Individual Differences (2008, methodology): “Coordinates representing the theoretical structure of Holland’s circumplex model with equal distances between adjacent types were taken from Rounds and Tracey (1993): R (.”
• Gender differences in STEM undergraduates' vocational interests: People–thing orientation and goal affordances (2015, background): “Central to this perspective is the assumption that interests are dispositional in nature and fundamental to career decisions because people prefer to situate themselves in settingswhere they can act on their interests (Holland, 1966, 1997; Lee et al., 2015; Su et al., 2009; Tracey & Robbins, 2005). ”
• THE STRUCTURE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION BASED ON SEVEN MAJOR PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES (2005, methodology): “The HPI was developed in the context of socioanalytic theory (Hogan & Roberts, 2000).”
• PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships (2011, background): “…Costa (2008); theory of personality levels: McAdams & Pals, 2006), the nature, development and influence of reputations ((neo-)socioanalytic theory: Hogan & Roberts, 2000; Roberts & Wood, 2006; also see: Hofstee, 1994; Vazire, 2010), the function of relationship qualities (Brown & Brown, 2006;…”
• Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009, background): “…1999), is that vocational interests are, rather than outgrowths of personality development, a direct reflection of an individual’s identity (i.e., the way we think of ourselves) that is best conceptualized in terms of a person’s motives, goals, values, and aspirations (Hogan & Roberts, 2000).”
• A Socioanalytic Model of Maturity (2004, background): “Third, identity, the way we think of ourselves, is best conceptualized in terms of motives, values, goals, and intentions rather than traits (R. Hogan & Roberts, 2000).”
• Mirror, mirror on my boss’s wall: Engaged enactment’s moderating role on the relationship between perceived narcissistic supervision and work outcomes (2012, background): “Accordingly, supervisor expectations for unmitigated backing create an inequitable exchange climate laden with hostility (Hogan and Roberts, 2000).”
• Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers (2001, background): “One of the pertinent issues facing researchers who study person–situation interactions is the relative independence of the “person” and the “situation” factors (for a review, see Hogan & Roberts, 2000).”