Holland's RIASEC Model as an Integrative Framework for Individual Differences

By P. Armstrong, Susan X Day, Jason P. McVay, J. Rounds. 2008

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f34bdb0e05b9d6681e5ea30488cc22dae9cf662d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. J. Rounds
2. W. Allison
3. P. Armstrong

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. J. Rounds
2. W. Allison
3. P. Armstrong

In Safety Research

1. J. Rounds
2. Yang Yang
3. W. Allison
4. P. Armstrong
5. Joan M. Barth

Citations in the corpus

• Gender differences in STEM undergraduates' vocational interests: People–thing orientation and goal affordances (2015, background): “In their seminal review of gender differences in career interests, Su et al. (2009) noted that interests have been characterized as trait complexes (e.g., Armstrong et al., 2008) and direct expressions of identity related to a person's goals, motives, and aspirations (e.g., Hogan & Roberts, 2000).”
• Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales (2008, methodology): “In particular, the availability of shorter interest measures would facilitate the current call for integrative research across multiple individual domains (Lubinski, 2000), such as the Atlas of Individual Differences proposed by Armstrong et al. (2008) , which uses Holland’s RIASEC types as an orga”
• Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009, unknown): “Armstrong et al. (2008) used interests as a structural framework for identifying trait complexes and interpreted the emergence of trait complexes as a process of contextual convergence, that is, individuals tend to seek out environments that allow for their various individual differences to…”